<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philanthropy, Politics and the &quot;Religion&quot; of Public Schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecivicfabric.org/2009/03/11/philanthropy-politics-and-the-religion-of-public-schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecivicfabric.org/2009/03/11/philanthropy-politics-and-the-religion-of-public-schools/</link>
	<description>Thoughts From the Stair Stepper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:13:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thecivicfabric.org/2009/03/11/philanthropy-politics-and-the-religion-of-public-schools/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecivicfabric.org/?p=599#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I received this comment via E-mail and got permission to post it on the blog.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Marshak [mailto:dmarshak@seattleu.edu]
Sent: Sat 3/14/2009 3:00 PM
To: John Mullaney
Subject: Re: David Brooks on Ed. Reform

John,

It’s not too surprising. Daniel Kim may have offered post-modern analysis,
but there are no elected state leaders that I know of who present a
consistently post-modern agenda on education issues.

Look at Obama. He won the election because he convinced a significant number
of folks  with post-modern consciousness to vote for him. On energy he has a
significant post-modern agenda. On education he’s stuck in the past like all
the other elected officials.

Are you familiar with Paul Ray’s research re traditional, modern, and
post-modern values/consciousness?

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received this comment via E-mail and got permission to post it on the blog.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;Original Message&#8212;&#8211;<br />
From: David Marshak [mailto:dmarshak@seattleu.edu]<br />
Sent: Sat 3/14/2009 3:00 PM<br />
To: John Mullaney<br />
Subject: Re: David Brooks on Ed. Reform</p>
<p>John,</p>
<p>It’s not too surprising. Daniel Kim may have offered post-modern analysis,<br />
but there are no elected state leaders that I know of who present a<br />
consistently post-modern agenda on education issues.</p>
<p>Look at Obama. He won the election because he convinced a significant number<br />
of folks  with post-modern consciousness to vote for him. On energy he has a<br />
significant post-modern agenda. On education he’s stuck in the past like all<br />
the other elected officials.</p>
<p>Are you familiar with Paul Ray’s research re traditional, modern, and<br />
post-modern values/consciousness?</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thecivicfabric.org/2009/03/11/philanthropy-politics-and-the-religion-of-public-schools/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecivicfabric.org/?p=599#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Jeff - Always the thoughtful and provocative question!  Thanks for the words from experience.  I would like to suggest Frederick Hess&#039; book to you.  He traced entrepreneurship but it describes how entrepreneurship needs to be embraced by the entire system.  He makes analogies to successful companies which presupposes the leadership embraces creating environments that would not only give permission for fourth-grade principals to innovate and take risk, but would encourage everyone in the system to do so, and in the process support each other.  The goal is creating the best product.  This implies careful quality control, talent development and financial analysis.  It is my dream that someone like the Governor and the leaders in the ODE would embrace that work ethic and vision for Ohio schools.  I think they can get there, they just need input from the business sector to help get them there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8211; Always the thoughtful and provocative question!  Thanks for the words from experience.  I would like to suggest Frederick Hess&#8217; book to you.  He traced entrepreneurship but it describes how entrepreneurship needs to be embraced by the entire system.  He makes analogies to successful companies which presupposes the leadership embraces creating environments that would not only give permission for fourth-grade principals to innovate and take risk, but would encourage everyone in the system to do so, and in the process support each other.  The goal is creating the best product.  This implies careful quality control, talent development and financial analysis.  It is my dream that someone like the Governor and the leaders in the ODE would embrace that work ethic and vision for Ohio schools.  I think they can get there, they just need input from the business sector to help get them there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Vander Ark</title>
		<link>http://thecivicfabric.org/2009/03/11/philanthropy-politics-and-the-religion-of-public-schools/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Vander Ark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecivicfabric.org/?p=599#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Thanks John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jaroscak</title>
		<link>http://thecivicfabric.org/2009/03/11/philanthropy-politics-and-the-religion-of-public-schools/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jaroscak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecivicfabric.org/?p=599#comment-113</guid>
		<description>John:  I enjoyed reading the section of this post about educational entrepreneurship.  I have been thinking about this lately.  I am struggling with whether I like the notion of schools functioning in an entrepreneurial manner.

If I have my definition straight (by the way, entrepreneurism is covered in Ohio&#039;s Fourth Grade Academic Content Standards), an entrepreneur is one who assumes the risk of business.  Applied to a school setting, I (as principal of a school) would take risks in terms of programming, infrastructure, and personnel in order to realize an &quot;upside,&quot; or profit.  Here is where the analogy breaks down.  What is the up side?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:  I enjoyed reading the section of this post about educational entrepreneurship.  I have been thinking about this lately.  I am struggling with whether I like the notion of schools functioning in an entrepreneurial manner.</p>
<p>If I have my definition straight (by the way, entrepreneurism is covered in Ohio&#8217;s Fourth Grade Academic Content Standards), an entrepreneur is one who assumes the risk of business.  Applied to a school setting, I (as principal of a school) would take risks in terms of programming, infrastructure, and personnel in order to realize an &#8220;upside,&#8221; or profit.  Here is where the analogy breaks down.  What is the up side?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

